Vistors’ Book

Stuff people wrote in the Arcade Visitors’book

Sophie56: If I could give it zero stars or negative stars I would do. Don’t waste your time it is crummy.

JuliusCrazy: Your story made my day! We once had a client ask if we could manage their pet’s food schedule based on reviews they received. It’s funny how sometimes people think we have supernatural abilities. Handling such weird feedback keeps the job interesting, the hilarity of customer expectations never ceases to amaze me.

RandomUser666

I don’t mind the basic concept, but the user experience is totally rubbish and most of the content stinks to high heaven. They really, really need to get their quality control shit in order. There have been massive bugs that thousands of people have complained about online  that still haven’t been fixed and each update gets worse and worse with this shit too.

This might sound stupid but I wish HappyEnd had a team dedicated to browsing Reddit and other community forums to patrol bugs, feature requests, and User Interface glitches and would start using that feedback to start fixing shit.

AriAri: Do not go there. It is a WASTE OF TIME

Donut-D: Smelled of Rats

SebGreen: I have reported this place and the unsavoury people to the Constabulary, the whole site clearly constitutes a non-crime hate incident.

Jakey: Very boring.

Mike-AK47: Refreshingly different I smiled for the first time since Covid.

Janet-JJ: There was nothing there. I was disappointed.

Zero-Hero: It used to be a wonderful minority interest refuge. But these new additions, they have absolutely ruined it! Awful. I am never coming back again.

Susi-Q: Absolute rubbish.

Dana: Don’t bother. I left the site depressed and I did not get my money back.

Harry_AF: A mouldy dump, embarrassingly bad, I don’t know how they had the nerve, I am sure they are breaking the law.

MaryWH: Piracy is illegal, this place should be shut down.

AndyW: Harmless fun, but rather off-colour.

Boson: Everyone’s the same. They are just interested in themselves and only care about their money. I hate it!

Abdul77: As a result of my refusal to embrace the use of artificial intelligence I am experiencing **coordinated harassment** by a group of people, which includes Gaslighting, manipulation, mental torture, and blackmail, administration of insults without my consent, continuous attempts to disrupt my work and daily life. As a result of this harassment my work has been blocked and undermined for the past 28 months. I have no income and cannot afford debt repayments on my Maserati, leaving me in an unsafe and vulnerable position. I do not have direct audio or video evidence, but multiple witnesses have observed these incidents.

Sharon-SS: It is all a scam. Don’t press anything. They are retards.

Lib22: This is the time the Sun meets Chiron in the next sign of the zodiac, a time when questions of identity and purpose can no longer be bypassed. Chiron, by conjuncting the luminaries in this configuration, holds the key to the deeper processes at play. It is the instinct of the human spirit to leave something immaterial behind. Our spirit, seeking manifestation, represents our “gift to the world” the alchemical process of turning a latent potential into a gift. The sick and hungry horse of Chiron may be ignored or even despised, but you find him there in your stable for a reason. He has endured time and hardship because he carries something only you can bring into the world – if you choose to care for him.

RudyPHD: The same mechanism that produces confident nonsense can produce coercive behaviour — and neither is best understood as moral failure, it is all AI slop. Look out for six fingered people alongside em-dashes, it is a sure-fire indicator you are being had by non-humans.

Animal-GH: I lived, worked, had a house, car, etc. as well had a relationship for 3 years. The worst years of my life. This is even worse than that one. Believe me: you are continuously controlled, watched and observed. even when you are sure you are not! It is my opinion and my experienceses. If you do not agree with me: I don’t care. I am not interested in your comments.

Spanner14a: The same as the other negative reviews. Fittings are awful. Bizarre copper green oxides erupt from under the chrome plastic film… Whole thing moves and wobbles and isnt ever stable enough to do the quick release after a single year. Save yourself some strife and just get a fixing that’s more robust. This is also not “natural” solid oak at all. Horrible plasticy veneer that’s already peeling and splitting. Just a bad product. However, never sitting on them I bet you think they’re incredible. As they’re easy to install and look ok. But within months just falling apart and quite expensive!

WebmasterWilf: We’re checking your connection for a moment to protect your visit and your data. Losing money to fraud is distressing, both emotionally and financially. If you’ve lost over £3,000 to a scam, we can help reclaim your funds with no upfront costs. We take care of the hard part so you don’t have to. We use cookies so that you can go hungry. This is not a scam, it is a legitimate business deal.

AdminResponse: Sorry, but nothing was found. Please try a search with different keywords.

Alexa_Dox: People continue to get more stupid

Below is some summarized information I invoked when I asked an artificial intelligence source, exploring web traffic decline trends. The point is that humans are getting even more lazy as well as stupid. They prefer not to think for themselves and like it when a machine tells them what is happening. There does not seem to be any scepticism:

“The shift toward AI-generated summaries is part of a much larger, systemic evolution in human cognition and information literacy. Sociologists, cognitive scientists, and media researchers view this transition as a move away from “deep reading” toward structural “skimming”, which fundamentally rewires how we process knowledge.

When users rely on search-page summaries instead of clicking through to websites, they are adapting to a digital environment that prioritizes speed over depth. This behavioral change triggers several major shifts in cognitive habits and media consumption.

1. Shift in Cognitive Load and “Offloading”

The human brain naturally seeks the path of least cognitive resistance to conserve energy. This leads to two distinct cognitive phenomena:

Cognitive Offloading:

Instead of actively reading, filtering, and synthesizing information from multiple websites, users outsource the synthesis stage entirely to the AI model.

The Google Effect (Transactive Memory): For years, humans used the internet as an external hard drive—remembering where to find information rather than the information itself. With AI summaries, this is morphing into “Synthesis Offloading”, where we no longer even learn how to construct a conclusion from diverse sources; we simply absorb the pre-packaged result.

2. Fragmentation of Attention and Hyper-Skimming

Reading an entire web page requires a sustained, linear attention span. Reading an AI summary relies on non-linear hyper-skimming.

Loss of Deep Reading Skills: Cognitive scientists note that over-reliance on bulleted summaries weakens the brain’s capacity for critical, deep reading. This diminishes our ability to follow complex, long-form narratives or nuanced arguments.

The “Satisficing” Habit: Coined by behavioral scientists, “satisficing” means accepting a decision or piece of information that is “good enough” rather than optimal. Users compromise on the absolute accuracy or depth of an answer in exchange for saving time.

3. Decontextualisation of Knowledge

Perhaps the most profound change is how information sources are used. Historically, information was tied to its source (e.g., an article by a medical doctor vs. a personal blog post).Source Blindness: AI summaries strip away the context, design, author authority, and ideological background of the original text. The information is presented as an objective, neutral “absolute truth” by the search engine.Erosion of Epistemic Trust: Because users cannot easily see who said something or why, their ability to judge the bias, motive, and credibility of a source is entirely bypassed. This makes it harder for individuals to build critical media literacy.

PritiPatriot: Sorry, but nothing was found. Please try a search with different keywords.